🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes a few key changes:

• Each team has just eight real players, with the rest filled by 32 bots.
• Actions done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it provides more options for players seeking alternative ways to have fun with the title. But, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. At the same time, in community forums, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while another details everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," while another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Community Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase queue times even longer for other modes because of the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the community meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

If the development team has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it's that they're listening and acting on feedback. Tasks being too difficult were adjusted very quickly, just like the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data shows this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.